Comparison
Compare equity platforms around your company's needs
Compare Carta first, then Qapita and Altshare against the work your team needs to complete. Pulley remains an outgoing-platform reference for existing customers.
Provider comparison
Confirm the exact scope in your proposal.
A checkmark is not a contract. Ask each provider to confirm the features, services, limits, and migration work included in your proposal.
Altshare’s published materials describe ASC 718 and IFRS 2 reporting, equity-plan workflows, waterfall modeling, funding scenarios, analyst-supported 409A valuations, employee access, common equity instruments, and onboarding options. Review Altshare’s published plans
An unknown is never shown as a red “No”, and an advertised product is never shown as included in every plan.
Broaden the shortlist
Other platforms worth investigating
These providers are not included in the detailed matrix yet. Use the same questions on migration scope, instruments, countries, reporting, service, and total cost.
Inclusion is not an endorsement. Confirm current capabilities and commercial terms directly with each provider.
What the labels mean
- Provider-published
- The provider describes this capability publicly; account-level availability still needs confirmation.
- Confirmed for your quote
- You entered written confirmation for this requirement.
- Needs confirmation
- Available evidence does not establish support for your situation.
- Historical
- Describes an outgoing platform, not a current buying recommendation.
- Not supported
- Used only when explicit, current evidence establishes non-support.
Go deeper
Carta vs Altshare
The main active-provider comparison for companies choosing a destination.
Build my shortlistPulley vs Carta
What existing Pulley customers should confirm about the official route.
Review the Carta route